My original vision for the front garden was to plant some semi-mature trees at the front which matched the ones in the churchyard opposite. In 2011, I noticed that these across the road were blooming with lovely white or pale pink blossom; it seemed that there were at least three different sorts of tree and they bloomed in sequence, so that there was blossom on at least one tree there for about eight or nine weeks.
When I found a landscape designer there were only two things I wanted: one was a good looking plan to get past the council tree officer and the planning department, and the other was the identification of some suitable tree species. The first was achieved but, on the second, one of the three is wrong. Now, you might say that two out of three is not bad, but when I pay someone a decent sum of money to give you expert advice, I expect that advice to be RIGHT. That is what being an expert means, isn't it?


Last year I was a bit puzzled as my new tree (left, ignore the hornbeam hedge in front) was the same shape as the one in the churchyard but had some odd leaves (more like elm?) with no sign of blossom at all. I put this down to the fact that it was only planted in November 2011 and I was just pleased that all the trees had survived the winter.
However, this year it is quite clear - it is definitely NOT the same species. I sent a photo (right) to the nursery who sold and planted the the trees and they think the one in the churchyard is a Morus (Mulberry) but I can't find a photo of one of these on-line which looks like the one over the road, so that might be incorrect as well.
Since I know that I described the blossom on the one in the churchyard in some detail to my so-called "expert", I am really severely dischuffed about the entire affair.
